post curry blog post - with swear words.

By Shiny

how the fuck can this happen?

the select committee removed the draconian section 92 from the amendment to the copyright act and all the "stake holders" agree.

and then, somehow, a supplementary order paper reinserts the fucked-up draconian clause at the *FINAL* reading of the act, and our parliament votes yes, and it becomes law

and then the minister in charge of this sorry episode says how dare we complain! that cabinet had alway intended to include "draconian" in the law.

an election happens, and we get a new government in new zealand.

we protest as loudly as we can, and our new prime minister agrees the law is draconian.

We achieve a delay to the draconian law.

and the ex-minister in charge of this crap law (who is now unemployed and not a member of parliament) says it's "childish" to protest against draconian laws.

and now here we are, 3 weeks out from the draconian section 92A becoming law.

how the fuck does this become the process by which laws are made?

5 comments

By Ben (not verified)
1 year 1 week ago

Brenda, we need to change the

Brenda, we need to change the dialog. Guilt on accusation was good for getting a delay, but we need to point out the basic rights violation and overly harsh punishment to get this thing abolished: http://www.ben.geek.nz/not-just-guilt-by-accusation/

By Matt P (not verified)
1 year 1 week ago

Wow. With an attitude like

Wow. With an attitude like that I can't imagine why Ms. Tizard lost her seat.

As a soon-to-be-resident of New Zealand, I find that a bit troubling; though at least Mr. Key seems interested in actually listening, as opposed to simply caving to media companies unilaterally.

As if recording companies have some guarantee that their chosen business model *must* remain viable in the face of new technologies. What part of "no due process" and "technological progress" do people like Ms. Tizard not understand?

By styga (not verified)
41 weeks 4 days ago

Today I found this

Today I found this interesting editorial in the New York Times by Stanley Fish (who, I might add is the dean emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at my alma mater, University of Illinois at Chicago). In his piece, he writes about a new "translation" of John Milton’s Paradise Lost http://www.ebook-search-queen.com/ebook/John/John+Milton%27s+Paradise+Lo... , which basically turns the poem into everyday-English prose.

By Brian (not verified)
19 weeks 6 days ago

New Zealand Kiwis are too

New Zealand Kiwis are too soft and mild for Draconian Laws

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <p> <img> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Twitter-style @usersnames are linked to their Twitter account pages.
  • Twitter-style #hashtags are linked to search.twitter.com.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.